🔗 Share this article

Just two days prior to the NYC mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange made a bold electoral prediction – not just who would win overall, but block by block. The analyst, a political analyst born and raised in the city, devoted more than ten years in progressive politics and has become something of a well-known figure this year for his thorough analyses into city data and voter surveys.

He released his highly detailed forecast map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate was victorious although failed to predict the independent candidate’s solid showing – on his Substack, his platform. Lange possesses a talent for witty coinages. He highlighted, for instance, the divide between the progressive stronghold, stretching from one neighborhood to Bushwick to Astoria, where he predicted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would win by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal outrank the New York Times” in readership and most voters favored Cuomo, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Patterns and Unexpected Results

How was your election night?

I had to do that since they were dropping approximately 200K ballots into the tally frequently! I felt somewhat anxious initially: Mamdani was ahead the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but there were large groups of ballots added after that and his lead went from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, there was a world where election day turned out somewhat badly for him, in which the opponent was going to end up essentially doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. However Mamdani gained half a million votes to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he succeeded. He campaigned and massively expanded his base from the primary.

Expanding Support

How did Mamdani get additional support from?

He built the coalition that the left long aimed for: diverse racially, youthful, tenants and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He gained significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the primary. Plus he boosted his core of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He built the coalition that the left always wanted to build: diverse, young, renters and residents struggling with costs

Additionally, there were some Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, limited to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Voters in immigrant strongholds that went for Trump last year went for Zohran this year. But I wouldn’t say he was winning over white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Turnout and Effects

A major development of the night was the sky-high turnout. Who benefited?

Both sides. Participation was significantly higher than I had expected. I figured we might go over 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – that is a lot of darn voters. There was a decent anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but his supporters was equally driven, and that was enough to secure victory.

You predicted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Currently you would say he’s favored to surpass 50%. He’s at 50.4% but remain around 200,000 votes left to report as of Wednesday morning. So I don’t think certain, but I believe it’s likely, and I hope he does because afterwards none can claim the Republican was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His support completely collapsed.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any area. Not even one neighborhood in the borough, similar to an highly conservative area. That really surprised me. The independent kept Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and then added all of these Republicans on Staten Island with a strong turnout. I believe occurred significant tactical voting by the Republicans. They were doing it prior to Trump tweeted his support for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome if the winning alliance failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your much mentioned “commie corridor” – was support for the candidate overwhelming in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view there was some weakening of the commie corridor in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, for example, the Greek landlords and residents supported Cuomo. So there existed a little resistance. However overall, largely the leftist base is another huge reason why Mamdani won – he was polling between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the vote we reported on if Mamdani was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

There are areas with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. But in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Manhattan area, his position on Israel definitely mattered there. Similarly in the moderate communities including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they favored Cuomo. Plus, you have newcomers from Eastern Europe in the borough, who were strongly supportive. So I don’t know if there were major surprises on this one, but Mamdani did hold left-leaning areas and including sections of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what New York means politically? Will the progressive base become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest political leaders from progressives come from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I believe that there will be more of that – people will come from these areas to be elevated nationally.

But I think that each urban center in the US can have their own commie corridor. Cities are the centers of progressive influence in the nation – because they’re young, people rent and they are places where people are crushed by the disparities we face.