🔗 Share this article

It has been described as among the biggest scams of its kind in the United Kingdom.

Altogether 14 people have been sentenced for their involvement in a £28m plot to defraud in excess of 3,500 timeshare owners.

The victims were desperate to get out of decades-old timeshare contracts and went looking for support.

The majority were from 60 and 80. Over 500 of them lost over £10,000, and a single victim paid more than £80,000.

Those affected were exposed to intense consultations lasting up to six hours. They were financially worse off, owning worthless fake "credits" and continued to be bound by high-priced timeshare contracts they frequently were unable to use.

The Firm At the Heart of the Scam

The company at the centre of the scam was Sell My Timeshare (SMT). They took people's money to finance the directors' lavish way of life of private schools, luxury homes and private jets.

The man at the top of the company, Mark Rowe, was given a 90-month sentence in January for deceptive scheme.

Recently, his partner another individual was part of the concluding cases to receive sentencing.

She was given a two-year long suspended prison term at the judicial venue after admitting money laundering.

The outcome represents a long time coming and represents a major victory for the people who spoke out, the police and prosecutors.

The Way the Investigation Was Initiated

The first knowledge of SMT came in the that particular year. I was working in the reporting team of a broadcasting service, producing investigative features.

A friend noted that his mum had taken over the use of a vacation unit in a European resort and, after long-term use, had commenced searching to terminate the contract.

It should be noted how widespread vacation properties had grown with English tourists in the eighties and nineties.

Vacation properties enabled individuals to access the equivalent unit each season, or trade their vacation periods with additional holders who had properties in different locations. Roughly 600,000 sun-lovers seized that option.

The initial boom was paired with a many stories about rip-off merchants deceptively promoting investments. They appeared frequently on consumer TV programmes.

The typical vacation property deal locked buyers for long periods.

At that time, those investors who had used their regular accommodation in the sun for a long time were getting older, and many were looking to say farewell to their holiday properties.

Some had declining mobility and found it difficult to access their properties. A few just felt they'd achieved their goals from them. And others had died, in many cases leaving their loved ones to inherit the deals - along with their annual payments and upkeep costs.

The Undercover Operation Progresses

This was the situation the friend's mum had found herself. She browsed the internet for solutions and came across the company, a firm whose digital platform claimed to get her out of her deal.

But, having paid a fee and arranged an appointment with them, her family smelled a rat.

Subsequent checking showed numerous individuals reporting they had handed over cash and received no benefit from the service. In fact, they had been left out of pocket. Significant sums.

The investigative unit started looking into what was happening. It quickly became clear that there were dubious individuals active in the vacation property industry.

One lawyer had many grievance cases aiming to litigate against SMT.

The team interviewed individuals who had used the firm and they collectively described identical situations. They believed the company would acquire their investment off them but when they went to a consultation (for which they made an advance payment) they were told there was no market for their property.

Rather, they were persuaded - in fact pressured - to invest additional funds investing in "the company's points system", named after the business's umbrella group, the overarching entity.

The precise definition was not exactly clear. They appeared to be a kind of currency, providing discount travel and services and retail offers.

And they were apparently "exchangeable with other owners, some time down the line.

Investing money at the time would result in an long-term benefit that would pay for the company's charges and allow the investor ahead financially, released finally from their pesky agreement.

Too good to be true? Well, yes.

A 'Misleading Scheme'

If these accounts were correct, this was a major deception.

It's what is called a "misleading sales."

A business - in this case SMT - "attracts the consumer by marketing a defined offering and then state it cannot be provided, steering the customer towards a different, lower-quality product or service.

That's illegal. Equipped with all the accounts we had gathered, we made the case to covertly record one of the firm's consultations.

Such an operation demands commitment, energy, and strong justifications for why this is the exclusive approach to gather the data required to demonstrate illegal activity.

Once authorized, our compact group organized a consultation with one of the company's representatives in Stratford-Upon-Avon.

Posing as a ordinary individual wanting to get his mum out of her timeshare contract|holiday ownership agreement